“If I’m called a
criminal for advocating that people have the right to defend themselves, for
telling them to...fight for what they deserve; if that’s criminal, then I hope,
I hope that I will always be a criminal.” -Robert F. Williams
As
illustrated by the quote above from the documentary “Negroes With Guns”, Robert
Williams’ call for the black population to defend themselves against violence
was often met with criticism and backlash from both the United States
government as well as members of the white population who believed that if
blacks armed themselves, more riots and violence would ensue. In the documentary, Williams’ wife declared
that Robert never wanted to be the leader of a national movement, but by confronting
racial tensions in the South and calling blacks to claim their rights by any
means necessary, Williams became a prominent leader of a widespread
self-defense movement in the African American community.
One
of the most effective ways that Williams confronted racial tensions in the
South was by founding the Black Armed Guard in his hometown of Monroe, NC. This organization, which included black men
of all ages, pledged to use violence as a response to any violence aimed at
black members of the community. Williams
also brought attention to the paradox of racial equality because he carried a pistol down the streets of Monroe.
This assertion of his second amendment right, usually only practiced by
Southern white men, was “unthinkable” for a black man at the time. Yet by showing his support for the equality
and freedom of all citizens, Williams rebelled against the social norms of the
time and encouraged others to do the same.
Another
facet of Williams’ self-defense campaign that helped confront racial tensions
was his encouragement of blacks to use violence to attain their constitutional
rights when the Constitution itself was not being enforced. Two incidents helped Williams develop his
support of violence as a tool to achieve social change. The first incident occurred in 1958 when some
black children and white children were playing together and two black boys
kissed a white girl as part of a game.
The two young black boys were arrested, beaten, and then jailed in cruel
conditions for six days without access to an attorney. Williams wrote several articles about the
injustice of the case and the bad press succeeded in getting the boys released
from jail early. The second incident was
when a white man assaulted and tried repeatedly to rape a pregnant white woman but
was found not guilty at his trial.
Frustrated by the judges’ refusal in both cases to enforce the
appropriate laws, Williams formally incited the black population to use
violence, if necessary, to defend their rights and their livelihoods. While Williams was in self-exile in Cuba, he
even used his radio show, “Radio Free Dixie”, to encourage African Americans to
continue to confront racial tensions and oppression in the United States.
During
the Civil Rights Movement, Robert Williams’ campaign for self-defense by any
means necessary, including violence, gave blacks a chance to confront racial
inequalities and to assert their desire for their rights and privileges as
Americans. By founding the Black Armed Guard
organization and using his radio show to voice his beliefs about how African
Americans should claim their constitutional rights, Williams fostered a
movement that condoned violence and contradicted the prominent non-violent
movement of the time, championed by other leaders such as Martin Luther King,
Jr. and James Lawson. Since King and
Williams had such different ideas about the most effective way to achieve
change, how do you think they would defend their points of view if put in a
room together? Which movement,
nonviolent or self-defense, do you think was more effective during the Civil
Rights Movement and why?
The story of Robert Williams is a great example how like most things in the pursuit of civil rights, even the basic idea of violence and non-violence was a complicated issue. His wife's claim that he never tried to become a civil rights leader is particularly interesting. The cases for non-violence and violence are usually attributed to Dr. King and Malcolm X respectively. Yet in the case of Mr. Williams, it was not am either or situation. It was a matter of common sense, if someone attacks you, you have the right and responsibility in a certain way to fight back. I have always admired King's commitment to non-violence and I think the effects that ultimately were the result of that passive resistance are unquestionable. But I think there is also something to be said for the logic presented by people like Mr. Williams or Malcolm which I could never ignore. I think it is hard deny that the fear and self empowerment that came from proponents of active resistance was important for the success of non-violence. It is also interesting to consider that although it meant rebelling against the "system" in the sense of directly challenging whites, it also was in someone just taking advantage of and working with in the system. Mr. Williams was not calling for any action that was not protected by the law. A simple matter of self defense.
ReplyDeleteViolence is not the answer. This is a phrase that we hear quite often as we grew up. However, violence did help Dr. King in his non-violent fight for equality. By maintaining non-violence, blacks were not further oppressed with the notion of being violent. Non-violence was the better method to choose during the civil rights movement, but violence did help further the efectivity of non-violence.
ReplyDelete