“People with the best intentions and the least
economic understanding constantly try to help the people on the bottom of the
economic ladder by governmental intervention” (Greaves).
As we’ve surveyed African American efforts to combat
inequality throughout history, we’ve often discussed the struggles African
Americans had to overcome in order to become active participants in American
society. These efforts to achieve
economic, political, and social equality were often established with the best
intentions and eventually led to considerable policy reform. Similarly, recent policy reform has
indirectly addressed economic disparities among African Americans, other
minorities, and whites and has attempted to tangibly reduce poverty. In particular, this is the case in the
relatively recent legislation that increased the minimum wage from $6.55 per
hour to $7.25 per hour. Unfortunately in
this case, policy makers failed to consider the unintended consequences of
policy intervention and created a situation worse than the original for low-skill,
African American wage workers.
Though a higher minimum wage appears to raise
employees’ net income on the surface, it actually ends up leading to, “if it
doesn’t manifest itself in lost jobs” (which it more than likely will), “fewer
hours, reduced benefits or both” (Carden).
With lost jobs and fewer hours worked, valuable skills cannot be
acquired, reducing future earnings for low-skilled workers. This problem is only magnified among minority
groups, with African American men being the most adversely affected by minimum
wage laws (as they comprise a large proportion of the low-skill labor market). According to an Employment Situation Summary
released by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, “the change in the unemployment
rate for ‘Black or African American’ workers was double” the unemployment rate
for all workers in 2009 after the minimum wage law was put into effect over the
summer (Carden). Though the economic
downturn may be to blame for some of the rise in unemployment, it would be
naïve not to consider minimum wage law as a significant, contributing factor to
the disproportionate effect on African American workers.
Because minimum
wages and other regulations “lock a lot of younger black males out of the labor
market,” “they do not acquire as many skills as they would if they were
employed. When they are older, therefore,
they earn less” (Carden). This creates a
perpetual cycle that eliminates opportunities for African Americans and other
minorities that tend to have low-skill jobs to escape poverty or to jump up
into the middle class. Under this
reasoning, it is arguable that the minimum wage laws and other regulations are
counterproductive to achieving the ends for which they were put into place. Though they were intended to positively
affect low-skill wage earners, they have instead adversely affected many of
those whom intervention was intended to help.
It is important to consider the results of policy intervention when
evaluating plans to address economic inequality among African Americans, other
minorities, and whites.
As much as policy makers
nobly seek to help those that are in need or are disadvantaged (perhaps, as a
product of our nation’s history), it is important to not
only look at the intended consequences of intervention, but also at the
unintended consequences that may harm those whom policies are intended to
help. How do you think minimum wage laws affect
low-skill wage earners? Given the
empirical evidence that African American men are more adversely affected by
minimum wage laws, how should policy makers proceed to address issues of economic
inequality?
I would certainly agree with you that although legislation designed to raise minimum wage was created with pure intentions to help the disadvantaged working low-income jobs, in many ways, this same legislation has negatively impacted the same people it was designed to empower. In general, I think this situation represents a difficulty in creating legislation to empower one certain group of people or one socioeconomic class without having at least some negative repercussions on the same group or another. Personally, I believe that if the policy makers and those whom the legislation is designed to impact were given the opportunity to collaborate and discuss the implications of their legislative design in greater detail, many adverse effects of such legislation could be avoided or caught before they spiral out of hand---like the unemployment increase spawned by minimum wage legislation. Although it may not be possible under the current system, I think that if policy makers were in closer coordination with the people whom their legislation is designed to impact, not only would they be represented "better" but problems due to legislation backfiring would probably be lessened.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteSince your research states that employment for African Americans has plummeted since the increased minimum wage (I'm assuming since employers can't afford to pay as many workers such "higher" wages), I feel that more foundational measures should be taken to combat this issue. In order to more thoroughly address problems of economic inequality, there must be easier and more widespread opportunity of education. The amount of education one has, or lacks, often plays a substantial role in economic disparities between minorities and their counterparts. In Tennessee, there is a recent initiative called TNAchieves that focuses on increasing higher education opportunities for Tennessee students through last dollar scholarships and guidance from mentors. With this program, public high school students who never thought of attending college and/or whose parents can not afford it (and may otherwise have limited options such as minimum wage jobs), have the opportunity to receive an education from a specified list of two and four-year institutions. There is no GPA or ACT requirement, and what financial aid does not cover, TNAchieves will. TNAchieves found from studies that even students with just an associate’s degree make over $400,000 more in a lifetime than a high school graduate. This is an example of a program that could help improve economic inequality. Though it is geared only toward senior high school students (who ultimately develop a desire to attend college), it is a model of a form of foundational structure needed to develop economic equality.
ReplyDelete