Deirdre
Copper Owens’ lecture “Defining Blackness: Examining Slavery, Race, and
Immigration in the Antebellum Era” explores the relationship between female
slaves and the advancements made in the field of gynecology during the 20th
century. Owens discusses two particular case studies in which race and status
were used to justify the abuse and exploitation of women, for the cause of medicine.
The first case involves Dr. James Marion Sims. He was a doctor who began his
research by studying and operating on half a dozen female slaves and then later
went on to establish his own hospital. At this hospital, Sims met and conducted
over thirty procedures on Mary Smith, a poor Irish immigrant, before botching
one and rendering her useless. The
second case Owens explores involves the stereotypes that surrounded female
slaves as a result of gynecological studies. Doctor’s began to think that a
female slave’s body was physically stronger and could endure more than a white
woman’s body. Doctors then turned this stereotype into a racist justification
for experimenting on and over-using female slaves’ bodies. Ultimately it was
the female slaves’ bodies that contributed to the advancement of gynecology not
the slaves themselves—for they had no control over their bodies or what was
happening to them.
Exploring
the less commonly known facets of slavery is essential to understanding the
institution as a whole. By Owens’
focusing her research on female slaves and their role in gynecological study,
she is providing insight into their horrifyingly unique experience. The notion
that female slaves contributed to the advancement of gynecology is, in my opinion,
tainted. The women experimented and operated on were not willing participants
nor did they have any say in what was happening to their bodies. Ultimately it
was the physical and sexual abuse endured by the women’s bodies that resulted
in such a fast progression of the science. The female slaves were not viewed as
people or women, they were simply seen specimens necessary to figuring out what
would and would not save a white woman’s life. In Owens’ lecture, she displayed
a painting of one black women sitting on an examining table surrounded by three
men and Dr. Sims. This painting depicts the racially unbalanced dynamic between
female slaves and doctors for the other men were only there to prohibit the
woman from thrashing around, due to extreme pain. Through this depiction, it
becomes evident that the female slaves had no control over what was happening
to them. Ultimately no type of medical discovery or advancement is great enough
to justify the abuse and sexual exploitation of women.
I was also present at Dr. Owens’ lecture. Her research is fascinating, but at the same time, heartbreaking. The stories and facts alone were enough to make me feel incredibly sorry for the women that were experimented on. However, the pictures Dr. Owens’ showed were really what hit me and made me realize just what the women had to go through. The picture of the black woman with the white men standing around her impacted me greatly, in that it painted a clearer picture in my mind of how the women were taken advantaged of, manhandled, and abused. The other graphic pictures she showed also stuck out in my mind. They were a clear display of how much these slaves and low-class whites suffered.
ReplyDeleteThough I agree that, “the notion that female slaves contributed to the advancement of gynecology is…tainted,” because clearly these women did not volunteer themselves to be operated on to such extremes and without any type of anesthesia, I do think that the women have to take credit in some way. These women did not only contribute to the medical findings, but played a huge role. Without them who knows how much we would know about the field of gynecology. So although crediting the women with the notion that they contributed to medical findings makes it sound like they wanted to help, which obviously is not true, it’s hard to find an alternative way to give them the “right” kind of credit without listening to a lecture like Dr. Owens’.