I brought this up at the end of
class today, and I was planning on writing on it even before Professor McKinney
mentioned that it would be a great blog post. Towards the end of “Beyond Beats
and Rhymes” one of the interviewees stated that, it was deplorable and sad that
the rappers and hip hop artists sung about sexual conquest, violence, and
drugs, but they have no other choice and it’s not their fault. This statement
resonated with me as something that was rather contradictory and worth further
discussion. It is true that there is a system hip hop and rap artists must
operate in, like all other professionally produced music genres. The question
then becomes to what degree can the artists themselves be held morally or
socially responsible for the lyrics they are rapping or singing?
The majority of the documentary
focused on the hyper-masculine, sexually explicit, and violent nature of the
popular hip hop and rap songs produced. Professors, students, students from our
own class and the average casual listeners off the street all deplored the
lyrics as derogatory and pejorative to the history and culture of African
Americans and modern society in general. Even a few of the artists and several
of the producers recognized the songs as different, less desirable forms of
musical expression. So why do these songs continue to be produced by the most
popular artists and dominate the iTunes Top 100 charts? Peter echoed the
sentiment my friends and I feel when he mentioned in class the statement made
by the white young man in his father’s truck; the music sounds good and that is
what matters. We as educated young people know that the lyrics describing a
thug’s life and hardships are exaggerated, embellished, or even down right
false. But, we listen to them anyway. The same thing can be said of popular
artists like Ke$ha and her song “Tik Tok”. Any intelligent human being knows
that it is ill-advised to brush your teeth with a bottle of Jack Daniel’s
Whiskey, but the beat and music make the song irresistibly catchy and enjoyable. Ke$ha’s example is not uncommon. Many other
artists have lyrics that differ from the appropriate societal norms, in many
ways similar to Elvis’ suggestive dance moves and lyrics during the 1950s.
The question remains, should the
artists’ songs be censored or should the artists not be allowed to produce that
type of music? The right to create the music is protected under the
Constitution but I believe that as awareness grows and the younger generation’s
conscious grows, this type of music will fade and give way to a new form of
social rebellion. Additionally, I think that the fact that many of the artists are African
American is mildly irrelevant. A strong majority of the songs currently topping
charts involve many of the same aspects under review in this documentary: sex,
drugs, partying, and violence. I believe it is unfair to hold rappers and hip
hop artists to a standard that is not being equally applied to pop, rock, or
even country artists. Perhaps the rap hip hop genre is just a more concentrated
version of the themes that spread around more evenly in other genres.
Robbie, although you raise some good points, I do not believe songs should be censored anymore than they are. There were just as many provocative songs when our generation was younger and no distinct “rebellion” occurred. Whether it be heavy metal or classical, I believe that music of any sort is a good outlet for not only self-expression, but emotions as well. People can blame the music for certain generational outlooks, but if it wasn’t the music, it would be something else.
ReplyDelete